Tucson City Council Exploring Allowing Camping in City Parks, "Help Huts"

Tucson City Council Exploring Allowing Camping in City Parks,

On the heels of recent votes to ban camping in parks and washes, Ward 6 Council member Karin Uhlich has proposed a new initiative: Help Huts.”

A Help Hut isnt to be confused with a Man Cave or a She Shed—though the concept is similar. These designated spaces would allow homeless individuals to occupy public park ramadas. According to the Ward 6 newsletter, here's how the program is outlined:

Tucson HELP HUTS Program – DRAFT
Pilot Period: July 1 – December 31, 2025

Background:
A growing number of Tucson residents have expressed interest in:
a) reviewing the rules around providing aid to unsheltered people in public parks; and
b) exploring the potential for creating a low- or no-barrier, sanctioned and managed site for unsheltered individuals to camp.

Goals:

           Expand low/no-barrier aid to unsheltered individuals

           Formalize partnerships between the City and nonprofit/faith-based organizations to enhance impact

           Increase structured presence and stewardship in designated city parks

           Build constructive communication and relationships between aid organizations, unsheltered residents, the City, and surrounding neighborhoods (including businesses and neighborhood associations)

Pilot Program:
The proposed Help Huts pilot aims to provide daytime and overnight aid to unsheltered individuals by utilizing designated park ramadas. The City currently has approximately 160 ramadas across 64 of its 134 total parks.

Under the pilot:

           A total of 12 ramadas would be designated citywide

           Six of these would also be available for overnight use (per draft guidelines)

           In parks with more than three rental ramadas, one would be designated for daytime use by organizations providing aid

           In parks with more than six ramadas, one could be used both during the day and overnight, subject to additional requirements

You can view the full newsletter here:

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Government/Mayor-Council-and-City-Manager/City-Council-Wards/Ward-6/Ward-6-News/Ward-6-Newsletter?article=3d87296

 

WATCH: TCFC GO INSIDE AN ENCAMPMENT AT A CITY PARK IN TUCSON

CLICK ON PICTURE OR HERE  

Interestingly, this experiment isnt entirely new—its already been happening in Tucson parks over the past several years, particularly in southside and lower-income areas like Santa Rita Park, Estevan Park, and 100 Acre Wood. These locations have hosted some of the citys largest and most active sanctioned encampments.

What we've seen—repeatedly—is that these encampments often grow beyond manageable levels and become plagued by drug dealing, prostitution, violence, theft (from both nearby neighborhoods and within the camps), and in some cases, sexual assault. The conditions are deeply concerning.

Given Council member Uhlichs remarks during the March 18 City Council meeting—and her vote in favor of banning camping in parks and washes—this proposal is a surprising turn. She has invited public input on whether Help Huts are a viable option.”

We want to thank all TCFC members who took the time to share their thoughts with the Ward 6 office. Many of you expressed strong concerns—and not just along party lines. The message from the community is loud and clear: Tucsonans want to show compassion to our unhoused neighbors, but allowing sanctioned camping in parks designed for the enjoyment of all residents is not the answer.

As we've consistently emphasized, what we need are balanced solutions: firm enforcement of existing laws and ordinances alongside support and treatment for individuals once theyve been held accountable. Thats the path to truly effective, compassionate progress.

Before and After

This story is a follow-up to a situation we highlighted two weeks ago. We expressed our deep frustration with the City of Tucson for allowing an encampment to grow unchecked in a wash beneath a bridge. Individuals were observed setting up makeshift structures from cardboard and wood pallets, openly using drugs, and contributing to the environmental degradation of our city.

We asked the question many Tucsonans are asking: Why does the City continually call on the public to volunteer to clean up garbage, graffiti, hazardous waste—including dirty needles and human feces—while simultaneously providing resources like transportation, cleaning services (while the encampments are still active), food, water, tents, and housing to the very individuals contributing to these conditions?

This approach not only enables dangerous and unhealthy living situations for the unhoused, but it also fuels the rise in drug activity, shoplifting, and trespassing that is impacting businesses and residential neighborhoods across Tucson.

The photos below show what we see again and again: the City allows these encampments to spiral out of control, while nearby businesses and residents suffer. Eventually, the City steps in to offer services—which are often declined—and moves the individuals along to another location, where the cycle begins anew.

This is a pattern. Its ineffective, costly, and harmful to everyone involved.

We urge you to stay vigilant and continue reporting dangerous or illegal activity:

           Call 911 for emergencies—even if you know response times may be slow due to limited police resources.

           Call 311 to report non-emergency issues in your neighborhood.

           Report encampments early and often at the Citys official Homeless Encampment Reporting Tool:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Government/Office-of-the-City-Manager/Homeless-Encampment-Protocol-Reporting-ToolTheseafter” pictures show what remains once an encampment is cleared. Volunteers will be asked to clean up this debris—just in time to prevent it from being swept downstream by monsoon rains.

We must break this cycle. Tucson deserves better.


23 comments


  • J

    Problems with the link to the video.
    “Sign in to confirm you’re not a bot.
    This helps protect our community. Learn more”


  • Heather

    All of Tucson needs to voice concern on this. Send email to Ward6@tucsonaz.gov with “help hut” in the subject line. Even if you don’t live in Ward 6. Because you know if one ward does it, it will be citywide.


  • Donna

    Tucson has become a Mecca for drug addicts, sober homes and rehabs and methadone clinics. Do we really want to encourage people to come here for that? Most addicts do not stop after rehab…they relapse. Then they stay here….then we have more and more homeless not looking for shelter. The homeless who want shelter and work have access to services. Addicts cannot stop long enough to qualify for shelter. If you google Arizona rehabs you’ll see how many encourage people to come here for addiction treatment. And the city just keeps increasing services to that population. If you build it they will come.
    Meanwhile the mayor and city council focus on creating more social services while they neglect the working, tax paying, business and home owners. That’s the disconnect that resulted in the fall of Prop 414


  • Tom

    Please, please, please. Language is a very powerful tool. Generally, if you control the language, you will win the argument. Two examples. First of all, “homeless”-what exactly does this mean? Is it the people who want the gypsy lifestyle and no part of ours? They just want to float around, unrestrained, doing whatever they do, panhandling, living off our sweat and tears, and then moving on? Is it the druggie who would rather spend his money on a fix then put a roof over his head, or live a a housing facility we already pay for? Who really is “homeless”, because if you really are not “homeless” you sure are using up a lot of resources that people in need can use? We need to agree on what a “homeless” person is.
    My guess is you wouldn’t classify the above as “homeless” for purposes of resource usage.
    Secondly, “!00 acre wood”-how sad that we call that area of 100 acres of waste, “100 acre wood”, but the effect? Most everyone knows that is where Winnie the Pooh lived, correct? So saying it or even thinking about it, softens the heart and is nostalgic. Please, do not refer to it as “100 acre wood”. It might be 100 acres of waste, but Winnie the Pooh and Tigger, and Eyore don’t live there. How can anyone want to hurt anyone who lives in “100 acre wood” with Winnie? How can anyone be so mean as to close up “100 acre wood”? Language. Use it wisely.


  • Sandi Eghtesadi

    No way – this is insanity. My business is already unsafe after dark at Broadway and Swan due to free buses. I am vehemently opposed to the City allowing homeless people into parks on an overnight basis. Youth sports and the enjoyment of what is left of public areas will be plagued by the same problems we have in the business districts of Tucson. This is no joke.


Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.