TCFC WINS on Prop 312; FREE CRIME BUS WITHOUT VOTER APPROVAL; New "ROMERO TAX" on BALLOT THIS SPRING

TCFC WINS on Prop 312; FREE CRIME BUS WITHOUT VOTER APPROVAL; New

Proposition 312 Passed

THANK YOU FROM  TUCSON CRIME FREE COALITION!

TOGETHER, WE ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE. TCFC and its members were a driving force that propelled this proposition to victory!

IT PASSED Statewide and IN PIMA COUNTY where it passed with a margin of nearly 9% indicating our elected leaders including but not limited to Tucson Mayor Regina Romero who publicly opposed Prop 312  are not in-sync with the voters on this issue. The passage of Prop 312 reflects the reality on the streets. Tucson is dying, our current electeds are failing us, and the public wants accountability.

TCFC worked tirelessly on this proposition along with the Goldwater Institute of Phoenix. We spoke with countless TCFC members to gather support and it is because of all of us this proposition will go into effect in January. Is it perfect? Certainly, not. It is however, a step in the right direction and will hopefully provide some relief to those of us who have been suffering under the current local government.

This proposition is a REACTION to city elected leaders not addressing our concerns and not providing real solutions like supporting the Pima County Transition Center to prevent property damage by those suffering from substance use disorder causing property damage to support their disease.

         *Keeping neighborhoods safe

         * Protecting AZ Taxpayers

         * Preserves public health

         * Ensures government is doing its  job by reimbursing property taxes if the government’s failure to enforce its own laws results in economic hardship to tax payers.

 

What is Prop 312 That Passed in November?  Questions Answered

This proposition will allow property owners (businesses or homeowners) in the city or county to apply for a tax refund when your city or county does not enforce laws regarding possession or use of illegal drugs, public urination or defecation, public consumption of alcohol, illegal camping, loitering, panhandling, obstructing public thoroughfares. A property tax owner can apply for a refund in property taxes to cover the direct costs a homeowner or business has been forced to undertake to mitigate the monetary damages if your local government  has undertaken a  policy, pattern or practice of not enforcing public nuisance law. You must provide documented expenses to evidence the damage to your property as a result.

When does Prop 312 Start?

In January 2025

How often can you apply for this refund?

Once every tax year

Is there a maximum amount I can apply for?

The amount cannot exceed your property tax amount. Any excess amount can be rolled into the next tax year.

How do you apply for a tax refund?

You can apply for a refund with the AZ Department of Revenue. You will need to have your documented expenses. Save all receipts and call 911 - even though you know an officer or deputy may not arrive. Keep a record of your calls. If you report online keep the # of your report

What happens after you apply for a refund?

After you apply for a refund, the city or county has 30 days to accept or reject the refund. If the refund is accepted, it will be paid to the property owner. Expect Pima County to initially reject all claims as a matter of practice.  If the refund is rejected, the property owner can file a lawsuit in the superior county of the county to challenge the rejection. If the city or county does not respond after 30 days, the property owner will receive a refund. If the documented costs are more than the amount of the most recent property tax bill, the property owner would be permitted to apply for a refund from their next property tax payment to cover the balance of the initial claim. Property owners would be eligible annually for refunds until the taxing entity begins enforcing the relevant public nuisance laws. 

Expectations?

Expect statewide litigation, bureaucratic delays, confusion, and a ton of uncertainty. TCFC will remain fully engaged and will continue to advocate on behalf of its membership.

 

Criminals cut into wall

Criminals stole copper telephone wire

Criminals are stealing street

Street Light copper wire cut and stolen.  We now have dark streets in our neighborhoods

MAYOR and COUNCIL continue FREE CRIME BUS to 2026 while asking for New "ROMERO TAX" to Cover it and other PET PROJECTS where as costs are being shifted to General Fund

New REGRESSIVE "ROMERO TAX" WILL HURT those already struggling

Mayor and Council voted recently to continue taking money from the General Fund to cover the FREE CRIME BUS Tucson can't afford.  The City moved the FREE CRIME BUS into the general fund to hide the fact they cannot fund it without a TAX INCREASE.  The "ROMERO TAX"  Increase will go to the Ballot this Spring will add 0.5% to all purchases in the City.  THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE 0.5% continuation of the tax for public transportation.

Tim Steller with the Arizona Daily Star proposes that if Mayor and Council really think the voters want to pay for a FREE CRIME BUS then we should be allowed to vote on it.  Here are some excerpts from his article: CLICK HERE: Let the voters decide on Tucson's fare-free transit

"To start off their last study session, city officials came to the mayor and council’s table and offered a menu of unappetizing options to pay for fare-free bus rides.

A new tax on rental cars would require a change in state law for this purpose. So would the formation of a special taxing district, as would other options.

Probably not gonna happen.

We could raise the hotel/motel surcharge, or the tax on public utilities, but those are already among the highest rates in the state.

We can beg the University of Arizona, Pima Community College and the school districts, but they’re under no obligation to help out, even though they do benefit heavily from free transit.

The mayor and some members of the council considered the whole topic at the Nov. 19 meeting to be premature and, it seemed to my ear, annoying.

[...] Next year, there are two tax elections, one for Tucson voters, and one for all Pima County voters that could absorb this cost. That way, too, voters could have a chance to weigh in on whether we want to pay for the idea.

It’s something Tucsonans talk about, perhaps because they think fares used to cover most or all of the cost of transit before the city went fare-free in 2020. That’s not true: Fares only covered a small portion of the cost of the transit system in the times before pandemic funding from the federal government allowed the city to go fare-free.

Fares covered around 10% of the cost of the entire transit system when Tucson decided to start covering the cost itself in 2023. At that time, the cost of not having fares was about $9.1 million, the city estimated."

KEVIN DAILY wins 4 MORE Years on the Flowing Wells School Board

TCFC congratulates Kevin Daily, for his November win of another term on the Flowing Wells School Board.  Congratulations Kevin!


7 comments


  • RJ

    Businesses could band together to file a class action lawsuit. Will the City report to us the amount of monthly refunds? Have they been barred from increasing property taxes to cover their losses?


  • Ted Peterson

    Congratulations to Kevin Daily. It’s good to see TCFC leadership steps up in other ways in the community.
    Vote NO on Tucson Prop 414 next year!!!


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.